← All Albums
Blue Note · 1963

Page One

Joe Henderson

Recorded: June 3, 1963   Original cat#: BLP 4140 / BST 84140
Joe Henderson — Page One album cover

Page One was recorded June 3, 1963 at Van Gelder Studio in Englewood Cliffs, NJ, produced by Alfred Lion. It's Joe Henderson's debut as a leader, and Blue Note built the session around a genuine frontline partnership rather than a backing band for a new signee: trumpeter Kenny Dorham, already an established Blue Note artist, plays alongside Henderson as a true co-lead voice, with McCoy Tyner on piano, Butch Warren on bass, and Pete La Roca on drums.

Best early pressing for audiophiles: Blue Note BLP 4140 – 1963 original mono pressing; see below on identifying a genuine first pressing.

Best modern pressing for audiophiles: genuinely close between three options – Analogue Productions' 2009 45rpm edition, Music Matters' 2014 180g edition, and the Blue Note Classic Vinyl Edition – see below on a detailed direct comparison that found two of these nearly indistinguishable once volume-matched.

Best-value modern: the Blue Note Classic Vinyl Edition – all-analog, mastered by Kevin Gray, pressed at Optimal in Germany; see below for why this may be a better value than its price gap with Music Matters suggests.

Recording history and tape provenance

Tyner's presence on the session carries its own small piece of label politics: because he was signed to rival Impulse! Records at the time, the original cover credits every musician by name except him, listing him only as "ETC." Dorham contributes two compositions that open the album, "Blue Bossa" and "La Mesha," while Henderson wrote the remaining four tracks, including "Recorda-Me." Both "Blue Bossa" and "Recorda-Me" went on to become genuine jazz standards, covered constantly in the decades since – "Blue Bossa" in particular, a hard bop tune inflected with the bossa nova rhythms Dorham had encountered on a visit to the Rio de Janeiro Jazz Festival two years earlier, remains one of the most commonly played tunes at jazz jam sessions worldwide. Blue Note released the album in mid-October or November 1963 (sources give slightly different months) as BLP 4140 (mono) and BST 84140 (stereo). One technical quirk worth knowing about before chasing a specific mix on this record: collectors have documented that "Homestretch," the closing track on side one, appears to come from a different mix than the rest of the album – the saxophone and trumpet channels are reversed relative to every other track, and there's some additional confusion in session documentation about whether two different takes (numbered 22 and 25) exist with different personnel. It's a genuine, documented oddity in the tape, not something specific to any one pressing.

Blue Note mono originals from this era are notoriously easy to mistake for later pressings sharing the same catalog number, and this title is no exception. Per the standard collector reference (the "Blue Note Records Guide for Identifying Original Pressings," compiled by Frederick Cohen of the Jazz Record Center), a genuine BLP 4140 first pressing shows: a "NEW YORK USA" address on both labels rather than a later West Coast address; no "deep groove" ring stamped into the label paper; the back cover address reading "47 West 63rd St., New York 23"; a hand-etched Plastylite "ear" mark (a small pretzel-shaped "P") in the dead wax, indicating the original pressing plant; and a laminated front cover. Copies without the Plastylite ear mark all postdate Liberty Records' purchase of Blue Note and are reissues rather than true firsts, regardless of what the label itself claims. One further caution worth passing along from a detailed LondonJazzCollector writeup on this title: because this album's inner sleeve convention changed roughly eighteen months after its original release, a genuine first pressing should not have the later-style inner sleeve – but since sellers can simply omit or swap inner sleeves, that detail alone proves nothing either way, and the reviewer pointedly notes that claims of "original pressing" based on assembling the right checklist of details can still be technically true of each individual detail while the overall "originality" claim remains unverifiable. Treat pressing-identification checklists, including the one below, as tools for ruling out obvious reissues rather than as airtight proof of a genuine first pressing.

Two separate, well-regarded modern audiophile reissues compete for the title of best-sounding modern version, and this guide isn't picking a winner between them since both have strong independent reputations. Analogue Productions issued a 45rpm edition in 2009 as part of "The Blue Note Reissues" series, manufactured by EMI Music Special Markets; one detailed Discogs owner review goes further than most, arguing this pressing doesn't just capture "the Blue Note sound" in the abstract but specifically "the soul of the sound" expected from a mint original Blue Note pressing – high praise from a reviewer who explicitly compared it against that standard. Music Matters itself issued a 180-gram, single-speed 33⅓ edition in 2014, limited to either 2,500 copies (per the matrix-confirmed Discogs release listing) or 3,500 copies (per one retailer's product description) – a real discrepancy between sources that couldn't be resolved, so both figures are noted here rather than one asserted as fact. It's mastered by Kevin Gray at Cohearent Audio, matrix-confirmed via the runout etching itself. At least one owner who has directly compared the Music Matters pressing against the later Blue Note Classic Vinyl Edition described the Music Matters cut as noticeably "more 3D" – a useful data point, though not the kind of exhaustive side-by-side comparison this guide would treat as fully settled on its own.

A detailed video review by the owner of a Phoenix, Arizona record shop (The 'In' Groove) directly A/B'd this exact title's Music Matters and Blue Note Classic Vinyl editions – along with two other Blue Note titles for cross-check – using volume-matching and a decibel meter to rule out the well-known effect where a louder-cut record simply sounds more impressive by default. His conclusion, after finding the two nearly indistinguishable once matched for level: both editions share the same mastering engineer (Kevin Gray) working from the same original tapes, and he argues there's no plausible reason an experienced engineer with over a hundred prior Blue Note credits would master the higher-volume, wider-run Classic Vinyl series worse than the smaller, pricier Music Matters run. He frames the price gap (Music Matters copies often reselling for $200–300 versus roughly $25–35 for a Classic Vinyl copy) as reflecting packaging and scarcity rather than a genuine sonic advantage – Music Matters' gatefold jacket, thicker tip-on construction, and session-photography reproduction are real, tangible upgrades, just not necessarily audio ones. He also reports a real, if minor, quality-control inconsistency on his own Classic Vinyl copy of this specific title: it arrived in a plain paper inner sleeve rather than the poly-lined sleeve his other Classic Vinyl titles came with, and the record itself had light surface scuffs (inaudible on playback) as a result. Take this as one detailed, methodologically careful account rather than a universal verdict, but it's a legitimate reason to consider the Classic Vinyl Edition a genuinely strong option rather than settling for it only when the pricier alternatives are unavailable.

Sound quality by pressing

The true first pressing, Blue Note BLP 4140 (1963 original), is identifiable by the checklist above. Owner reviews describe the original recording as remarkably present and well-separated even by later Blue Note standards, with Van Gelder's engineering giving Dorham's trumpet and Henderson's tenor genuinely distinct spatial placement rather than a blended horn section sound.

The Analogue Productions 45rpm (2009) is part of Analogue Productions' original run of Blue Note reissues, before the label's later Tone Poet and Blue Note Classic Vinyl series existed. Owner reviews single it out favorably even against Music Matters' well-regarded catalog.

The Music Matters (2014, 180g) has matrix-confirmed mastering by Kevin Gray at Cohearent Audio. Owner reviews describe a "deep black background" with strong instrument separation, praising the thickness and body of the trumpet and tenor tones specifically.

The Blue Note Classic Vinyl Edition is a more recent, more accessible all-analog reissue, mastered by Kevin Gray from the original master tapes and pressed at Optimal in Germany – a different pressing plant from Music Matters' RTI pressings, and a more affordable way to get Kevin Gray's mastering without the limited-edition pricing of the 2014 Music Matters release.

Buyer's guide by budget

$$$: The Blue Note Classic Vinyl Edition – all-analog Kevin Gray mastering, and per a detailed direct comparison, close to sonically indistinguishable from the pricier Music Matters edition once volume-matched.

$$$$: A clean Blue Note BLP 4140 original – verify the full first-pressing checklist above before paying a premium.

$$$$$: Music Matters' 2014 180g edition, or Analogue Productions' 2009 45rpm edition – the premium here buys superior packaging and collectibility more than a confirmed sonic edge, per the comparison above.

Pressing tier summary

Tier ⇅ Pressing Cat# Year ⇅ Format Source / Mastering Notes Market ⇅
S Analogue Productions 45rpm BST 84140 (AP) 2009 Stereo, 45rpm, 2×12" The Blue Note Reissues series; EMI-manufactured Numbered by sticker on some copies
$159VG+
$208NM
$233M
S Music Matters MM33BNST-84140 2014 Stereo, 33⅓, 180g Kevin Gray, Cohearent Audio Limited to 2,500 copies per Discogs, or 3,500 per one retailer – discrepancy unresolved
$138VG+
$180NM
$202M
A Blue Note BLP 4140 BLP 4140 1963 Mono, 33⅓ Rudy Van Gelder / Plastylite First pressing; see identification checklist above
$828VG+
$1,083NM
$1,210M
A Blue Note Classic Vinyl Edition BST 84140 Stereo, 33⅓, 180g Kevin Gray; pressed at Optimal (Germany) A detailed volume-matched comparison found this close to indistinguishable from Music Matters sonically; the price gap is mostly packaging

References

Know something we don't? Spotted an error or have a pressing to add?

Edit this page on GitHub